MWF: Ned Kelly Awards

August 29, 2009

nedkelly 003This object is a Ned Kelly Award – memorably described by Shane Maloney as looking like “a sawn-off anthracite dildo”  – now one of my most prized possessions since Ghostlines won the award for best first novel last night at the Ned Kelly Awards – the annual awards for Australian crime writing. On the underside it has the letters “C.W.A.A” which stand not for Country Women’s Association but Crime Writers Association of Australia.

This wasn’t one of those stuffy awards nights of polite applause and formal speeches – as became clear early in the piece when MC Jane Clifton flashed her magnificent spangly derriere at the audience. Unfortunately I don’t have a photo of that but maybe the official photographer snapped it.

The night kicked off with a debate on the topic “Women do it better” between (for the affirmative) Liz Porter and P.D. Martin, and, (for the negative) crime legend Peter Corris and Underbelly co-author John Silvester. Porter and Martin claimed that women are much better at crime than men for the simple reason that they carry it out so well that they never get caught.  This was only slightly undermined when Martin pulled a (toy) gun out of her handbag upside down. Porter, though, produced a stiletto from her boot with convincing style. Women, they claimed, are more likely to get away with a crime: unlike men, women do not have an irresistible urge to boast about what they have done. In contrast, Corris gave a list of all the male writers who he claims invented the various genres of crime writing (Conan Doyle, Ed McBain, Raymond Chandler -  he ignored Agatha Christie and Dorothy Sayers) and claimed that “women couldn’t drive getaway vehicles – they can’t even find a park at Chadstone”. You have to be a crime legend to get away with a line like that.

But Silvester brought the house down with anecdotes of the Melbourne underworld. He started with a blatant suck-up to the women in the audience, by claiming that females are just too smart to get involved in crime in the first place. Then, contradictorily, he cited Melbourne matriarch Kath Pettingill as his exemplar of a female criminal. One of Kath’s master crimes, according to Silvester, was her attempt to shoplift a toy dinosaur from a department store. The dinosaur was equipped with a voice box to give it a terrifying roar, and while Kath had it stuffed under her clothes the thing started to groan. Kath tried to pass it off by claiming she had terrible flatulence, but even this cunning ruse didn’t succeed.  Silvester also weighed into the debate about criminal nicknames (a topic which I considered here), saying: “When you hire a hit man, you  want someone with a nickname like “Steel eyes” or “Two guns”. Judy Moran (allegedly) decided to choose someone called “Nuts”.

I don’t know who won the debate – the applause seemed to me about equal for both, though Lynne unaccountably thinks the women won –  but the Ned Kelly Awards went to:

  • Lifetime achievement award – Shane Maloney (Interview with Shane in The Age here)  
  • Best novel: shared by Deep Water by Peter Corris and Smoke and Mirrors by  Kel Robertson
  • Best true crime: The Tall Man by Chloe Hooper  
  • Best first fiction: Ghostlines by Nick Gadd
  • S.D.Harvey short story award:  Scott McDermott.

The Neddies have some quirks, I have discovered. One is that on the night they distribute a handout of judges’ comments on all the books. Nothing odd about that, you might think – except that just about all the comments are neutral at best or negative at worst. (It wasn’t just my book, it was all of them). So on your night of nights, you have the pleasure of reading comments like “solid” “not over-laboured” and “the supernatural element is unnecessary and confusing”. Ah well – it provided some material for my speech.

Slightly more annoying is the almost complete lack of publicity for the awards. If the point of the Ned Kellys is to promote crime writing, you would think the organisers could at least put out a media release of the winners and update their own website! As it was, the Neds weren’t even reported in the daily bulletin of the Melbourne Writers Festival, of which they were ostensibly a part. Fortunately some bloggers reported on the event – among them, Perry Middlemiss, Mysteries in Paradise and Angela Savage.

10 Responses to “MWF: Ned Kelly Awards”

  1. Kerrie said

    Congratulations on the award Nick. It is held in high esteem by crime fiction readers not only here in Australia but overseas, and authors who win awards are marked as people to watch.

  2. Congratulations Nick. I am thrilled for you. A well earned and worthy award for a wonderful book. My blog about the Neddies and the Davitts is here

    • nickgadd said

      Many thanks Angela. Having read your blog, it sounds like the Davitts was a more cerebral event than the Neddies! But they do have their own strange charm.

  3. Congratulations Nick! Excellent news! There must be something in the water at Scribe — you and Chris Wolmersley have both won this. I hope you are still celebrating!

    best

    Jacinta

    • nickgadd said

      Yep – it’s an honour to follow in Chris’s footsteps, cos The Low Road is great – and I’m very happy to be part of Scribe’s impressive fiction stable!

  4. Helen said

    Congratulations Nick
    Honoured to work with an award winning writer – and I did really enjoy your book.
    Helen

  5. I was standing next to my bookseller at the ceremony when you accepted the award. He’d sold me a copy of your book before you’d even left the stage. Not sure if that’s a record for me, but it would have to be close.

    Congratulations.

    The debate was given to the ladies, though, like you, I thought John Silvester was pretty damn good.

  6. Adrian Hyland said

    Hello Nick – this is Adrian Hyland. I’m an author with Text. Congratulations on the Neddy. Sorry I haven’t caught up with Ghostlines yet, but will do so forthwith. Looks like a terrific blog – I do love literate crime writers. Cheers. Adrian

Leave a Reply